.. AUTO-GENERATED FILE -- DO NOT EDIT!

.. _example_eventrelated:


Spatio-temporal Analysis of event-related fMRI data
===================================================

.. index:: event-related fMRI

In this example we are going to take a look at an event-related analysis of
timeseries data. We will do this on fMRI data, implementing a spatio-temporal
analysis of multi-volume samples. It starts as usual by loading PyMVPA and
the fMRI dataset.

::

  from mvpa2.suite import *

  ds = load_datadb_tutorial_data(roi=(36,38,39,40))



The dataset we have just loaded is the full timeseries of voxels in the
ventral temporal cortex for 12 concatenated experiment runs. Although
originally a block-design experiment, we'll analyze it in an event-related
fashion, where each stimulation block will be considered as an individual
event.

For an event-related analysis most of the processing is done on data
samples that are somehow derived from a set of events. The rest of the data
could be considered irrelevant. However, some preprocessing is only
meaningful when performed on the full timeseries and not on the segmented
event samples. An example is the detrending that typically needs to be done
on the original, continuous timeseries.

In its current shape our dataset consists of 1452 samples that represent
contiguous fMRI volumes. At this stage we can easily perform linear
detrending. We are going to do it per each experiment run (the dataset has
to runs encoded in the ``chunk`` sample attribute), since we do not assume a
contiguous linear trend throughout the whole recording session.


::

  # detrend on full timeseries
  poly_detrend(ds, polyord=1, chunks_attr='chunks')



Let's make a copy of the detrended dataset that we can later on use for
some visualization.


::

  orig_ds = ds.copy()



We still need to normalize each feature (i.e. a voxel at this point). In
this case we are going to Z-score them, using the mean and standard
deviation from the experiment's rest condition. The resulting values might
be interpreted as "activation scores". We are again doing it per each run.


::

  zscore(ds, chunks_attr='chunks', param_est=('targets', 'rest'))



After detrending and normalization, we can now segment the timeseries into
a set of events. To achieve this we have to compile a list of event
definitions first. In this example we will simply convert the block-design
setup defined by the samples attributes into events, so that each
stimulation block becomes an event with an associated onset and duration.
The events are defined by a change in any of the provided attributes, hence
we get an event for starting stimulation block and any start of a run in
the experiment.


::

  events = find_events(targets=ds.sa.targets, chunks=ds.sa.chunks)



``events`` is a simple list of event definitions (each one being a
dictionary) that can easily inspected for startpoints and duration of
events. Later on we want to look at the sensitivity profile ranging from
just before until a little after each block. Therefore we are slightly
moving the event onsets prior the block start and request to extract a
set of 13 consecutive volumes a as sample for each event.  Finally, in this
example we are only interested in `face` or `house` blocks.


::

  # filter out events
  events = [ev for ev in events if ev['targets'] in ['house', 'face']]

  # modify event start and set uniform duration
  for ev in events:
      ev['onset'] -= 2
      ev['duration'] = 13



Now we get to the core of an event-related analysis. We turn our existing
timeseries datasets into one with samples of timeseries segments.

PyMVPA offers :func:`~mvpa2.datasets.eventrelated.eventrelated_dataset()`
to perform this conversion -- given a list of events and a dataset with
samples that are sorted by time. If a dataset has information about
acquisition time :func:`~mvpa2.datasets.eventrelated.eventrelated_dataset()`
can also convert event-definition in real time.


::

  evds = eventrelated_dataset(ds, events=events)



Now we have our final dataset with spatio-temporal fMRI samples. Look at
the attributes of the dataset to see what information is available about
each event. The rest is pretty much standard.

We want to perform a cross-validation analysis of a SVM classifier. We are
not primarily interested in its performance, but in the weights it assigns
to the features. Remember, each feature is now voxel-timepoint, so we get a
chance of looking at the spatio-temporal profile of classification relevant
information in the data. We will nevertheless enable computing a confusion
matrix, so we can assure ourselves that the classifier is performing
reasonably well, since only a generalizing classifier model is worth
inspecting, as otherwise the assigned weights are meaningless.


::

  clf = LinearCSVMC()
  sclf = SplitClassifier(clf, enable_ca=['confusion'])

  # Compute sensitivity, which internally trains the classifier
  analyzer = sclf.get_sensitivity_analyzer()
  sensitivities = analyzer(evds)



Now let's look at the confusion matrix -- it turns out that the classifier
performs excellent.


::

  print sclf.ca.confusion



We could now convert the computed sensitivities back into a 4D fMRI image
to look at the spatio-temporal sensitivity profile using the datasets
mapper. However, in this example we are going to plot it for two example
voxels and compare it to the actual signal timecourse prior and after
normalization.


::

  # example voxel coordinates
  example_voxels = [(28,25,25), (28,23,25)]



First we plot the orginal signal after initial detrending. To do this, we
apply the timeseries segmentation to the original detrended dataset and
plot to mean signal for all face and house events for both of our example
voxels.


::

  vx_lty = ['-', '--']
  t_col = ['b', 'r']

  pl.subplot(311)
  for i, v in enumerate(example_voxels):
      slicer = np.array([tuple(idx) == v for idx in ds.fa.voxel_indices])
      evds_detrend = eventrelated_dataset(orig_ds[:, slicer], events=events)
      for j, t in enumerate(evds.uniquetargets):
          pl.plot(np.mean(evds_detrend[evds_detrend.sa.targets == t], axis=0),
                 t_col[j] + vx_lty[i],
                 label='Voxel %i: %s' % (i, t))
  pl.ylabel('Detrended signal')
  pl.axhline(linestyle='--', color='0.6')
  pl.legend()



In the next step we do exactly the same again, but this time for the
normalized data.


::

  pl.subplot(312)
  for i, v in enumerate(example_voxels):
      slicer = np.array([tuple(idx) == v for idx in ds.fa.voxel_indices])
      evds_norm = eventrelated_dataset(ds[:, slicer], events=events)
      for j, t in enumerate(evds.uniquetargets):
          pl.plot(np.mean(evds_norm[evds_norm.sa.targets == t], axis=0),
                 t_col[j] + vx_lty[i])
  pl.ylabel('Normalized signal')
  pl.axhline(linestyle='--', color='0.6')



Finally, we plot the associated SVM weight profile for each peristimulus
timepoint of both voxels. For easier selection we do a little trick and
reverse-map the sensitivity profile through the last mapper in the
dataset's chain mapper (look at ``evds.a.mapper`` for the whole chain).
This will reshape the sensitivities into ``cross-validation fold x volume x
voxel features``.


::

  pl.subplot(313)
  smaps = evds.a.mapper[-1].reverse(sensitivities)

  for i, v in enumerate(example_voxels):
      slicer = np.array([tuple(idx) == v for idx in ds.fa.voxel_indices])
      smap = smaps.samples[:,:,slicer].squeeze()
      plot_err_line(smap, fmt='ko', linestyle=vx_lty[i])
  pl.xlim((0,12))
  pl.ylabel('Sensitivity')
  pl.axhline(linestyle='--', color='0.6')
  pl.xlabel('Peristimulus volumes')



.. figure:: ../pics/ex_eventrelated.*
   :align: center

   Sensitivity profile for two example voxels for *face* vs. *house*
   classification on event-related fMRI data from ventral temporal cortex.

This demo showed an event-related data analysis. Although we have performed
it on fMRI data, an analogous analysis can be done for any timeseries-based
data in an almost identical fashion.

.. seealso::
  The full source code of this example is included in the PyMVPA source distribution (`doc/examples/eventrelated.py`).
